The whole struggle for the 1760s can be seen as a firm commitment by the settlers to economic and political independence, as an attempt to eliminate illegal taxes and customs duties, which they believed was possible. One of these attempts was the Boston Non-Import Agreement, which, although not very successful, also contributed to this struggle, which would later lead to an escalation of conflicts and, later, to the American Revolution itself. It can also be concluded that non-imports were also a means of cleaning up inventories, resetting profitability and offsetting exchange rates. Boston traders and traders have cut their imports of British products by almost half. Unfortunately, the other port cities and the colonies themselves did not adopt the policy of non-importing Boston merchants, which undermined their boycott efforts. This failure of cooperation meant that trade between England and the colonies was sufficient. British traders had not felt a threat in this sluggish effort and had not agreed to abolish the Townshend Act. Definition of non-import agreementsThe meaning and definition of non-import agreements: non-import agreements (176575) constituted a series of trade restrictions that boycotted British imports. Non-import agreements were adopted by American settlers to protest British laws and taxes before the American Revolution. Associations were organized by the sounds of liberty and Whig merchants to boycott English products in response to new taxes. American settlers were prevented from buying British imports.
Other U.S. cities have implemented similar non-import agreements to oppose the unpopular British policy. The use of raw materials, goods produced in the colonies and Yankee ingenuity were commonplace. Meanwhile, the American colonies experimented with the idea of being self-sufficient and not relying on the metropolis. This experience would be invaluable, because in a few years during the revolution, the British Royal Navy would blockade the American coast and close many major port cities. In the non-import agreement in Boston, traders and traders agreed to boycott goods under the Townshend Revenue Act until taxes on those goods were lifted. Some critical products have been excluded from the boycott, such as salt, hemp and duck cloths. Smuggling was widespread. This was a direct violation of the Navigation Act.
Almost all American communities have benefited or participated in the smuggling of illicit goods purchased by Dutch, French and Spanish traders. Smuggling was not only a cheaper alternative to taxed British products, but it also served as an effective means of resisting and undermining British politics. Boston was overwhelmed by smuggling and smugglers. The Sons of Liberty financed their organization through lucrative smuggling operations. Smuggling financed much of their opposition to British authority. Samuel Adams, John Hancock and Paul Revere were all known as notorious patriotic Boston traffickers. One of these fraudulent importers was John Hancock, a merchant, statesman and patriot of the American Revolution. He had goods from his captains prohibited by the agreement. Its ships carried cargoes such as British lines or gunpowder.
Another known trafficker was Samuel Adams, a well-known American statesman, who later became one of the organizers of the Boston Tea Party.